 |
|
 |
||
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Macon MFA 1805 A N Missouri St Macon, MO 63552 660-385-5753 Shelbina MFA 215 W Maple St Shelbina, MO 63468 573-588-4140 CLICK - MFA CONNECT |
|
Printable Page
06/23 14:23 CDT The NCAA changed its eligibility rules. What does that mean for
transfers, rosters and playing time?
The NCAA changed its eligibility rules. What does that mean for transfers,
rosters and playing time?
By MAURA CAREY
AP Sports Writer
Tyler Shough needed seven years of college football to become a starting NFL
quarterback.
Under the new eligibility model model approved Tuesday, athletes will no longer
have that option.
Athletes in Division I, the top level of competition, will have five years to
complete five seasons of competition, a move the NCAA hopes will add structure
to a system stretched into chaos and courtrooms by countless transfers,
redshirt decisions, injuries, players seeking more seasons to cash in on NIL
opportunities and even pandemic-era complexities.
The eligibility clock starts when an athlete enrolls full time or at the
beginning of the academic year following their 19th birthday, whichever occurs
first.
If the new rules withstand potential legal challenges, the development of
college athletes will undergo a dramatic shift. There will be no more
traditional redshirt years, nor will there be medical or general extension
waivers available; the only limited exceptions for going beyond five-in-five
would be for military service, religious missions and maternity leave.
Tom Loy, a national recruiting analyst for 247Sports, said he believes the
change could keep talented players in college for longer.
"In addition, I believe this rule change would have coaches putting a
significant emphasis on retaining as much of the current roster as possible,
especially upperclassmen, while focusing their attention slightly less on the
transfer portal," Loy said in an email. "With the opportunity to play five full
seasons, they could have a roster full of 23-year-olds, for example, compared
to 18- or 19-year-olds, and beyond that, potentially have a group full of
talent they have developed in their system."
The end of the redshirt Shough spent two seasons at Oregon and three at Texas Tech before suiting up at Louisville as a seventh-year senior in 2024. Injuries, a redshirt season and the pandemic extended his college career, extra time that helped turn him into a second-round draft pick and, eventually, the starting quarterback for the New Orleans Saints. He believes future college athletes should be given the same opportunities. "I think everybody should have a chance to at least get a medical and then a redshirt," Shough said. "I know I benefited from that experience, the maturation process, having to compete multiple years. I feel strongly about that." Detroit Lions rookie defensive lineman Aidan Keanaaina followed a similar path. His six-year college career included an undergraduate stint at Notre Dame and two postgraduate seasons at California following a medical redshirt and pandemic waiver, when the NCAA gave thousands of athletes an extra year. The 5-in-5 rule would have taken away his final college season in 2025, a year that helped him make his case to NFL scouts. Even so, he understands the effort to bring order to a landscape he described as the wild West. "You can't please everyone in this world, ever, but they're trying to please as many people as they can and do right by as many people as possible," said Keanaaina, an undrafted free agent. "As someone who was injured, I think it's tough to make a one-size-fits-all rule. But I also get that sometimes an older player is taking opportunities away from a younger one."
It could change recruiting or have other ripple effects While Shough and Keanaaina point to what the new model could eliminate, others believe opportunities will be created elsewhere in college sports. "I think it's the NCAA's way of keeping college sports as amateur as possible with the chaos that is the NIL era. It will be good for sports like lacrosse where post-grad and redshirt years are less common than in football," said Kelsey Fee, an assistant women's lacrosse coach at Dartmouth. "It will open up the portal to a new slew of craziness with kids looking to use their fifth year." Fee said she also thinks the shift will bring an excitement to recruiting that hasn't been felt in recent years. Loy, the recruiting analyst, said coaches could be more interested in high school prospects "and getting these guys on the field as quickly as possible." "Whether it works out or not, everyone would get a glimpse at where each prospect stands compared to others," he wrote. "The players would get the early playing time, the coaches would see who outperforms who, and then, without the ability to redshirt anyone, a prospect can continue to be developed if they want to stick around and compete. They also wouldn't just rush to leave and transfer, since they know they have five years to play ball." Green Bay Packers center and 2022 third-rounder Sean Rhyan predicted stricter eligibility guidelines could change the way athletes think about transferring: Once the clock starts ticking, a case can no longer be made to rectify a misstep. "Five for five, that's fair. I think NIL is good, but I also think it took away that loyalty aspect that I think sports need," Rhyan said. "Having that fixed amount of time is going to bring that loyalty." And then Rhyan added perhaps the most convincing argument of all: "Having like a 27-year-old linebacker or something and then you have a 17-year-old running back ... I think five for five is more than fair." ------ AP Sports Writers Larry Lage, Steve Megargee and Brett Martel contributed to this report. ___ AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
The end of the redshirt Shough spent two seasons at Oregon and three at Texas Tech before suiting up at Louisville as a seventh-year senior in 2024. Injuries, a redshirt season and the pandemic extended his college career, extra time that helped turn him into a second-round draft pick and, eventually, the starting quarterback for the New Orleans Saints. He believes future college athletes should be given the same opportunities. "I think everybody should have a chance to at least get a medical and then a redshirt," Shough said. "I know I benefited from that experience, the maturation process, having to compete multiple years. I feel strongly about that." Detroit Lions rookie defensive lineman Aidan Keanaaina followed a similar path. His six-year college career included an undergraduate stint at Notre Dame and two postgraduate seasons at California following a medical redshirt and pandemic waiver, when the NCAA gave thousands of athletes an extra year. The 5-in-5 rule would have taken away his final college season in 2025, a year that helped him make his case to NFL scouts. Even so, he understands the effort to bring order to a landscape he described as the wild West. "You can't please everyone in this world, ever, but they're trying to please as many people as they can and do right by as many people as possible," said Keanaaina, an undrafted free agent. "As someone who was injured, I think it's tough to make a one-size-fits-all rule. But I also get that sometimes an older player is taking opportunities away from a younger one."
It could change recruiting or have other ripple effects While Shough and Keanaaina point to what the new model could eliminate, others believe opportunities will be created elsewhere in college sports. "I think it's the NCAA's way of keeping college sports as amateur as possible with the chaos that is the NIL era. It will be good for sports like lacrosse where post-grad and redshirt years are less common than in football," said Kelsey Fee, an assistant women's lacrosse coach at Dartmouth. "It will open up the portal to a new slew of craziness with kids looking to use their fifth year." Fee said she also thinks the shift will bring an excitement to recruiting that hasn't been felt in recent years. Loy, the recruiting analyst, said coaches could be more interested in high school prospects "and getting these guys on the field as quickly as possible." "Whether it works out or not, everyone would get a glimpse at where each prospect stands compared to others," he wrote. "The players would get the early playing time, the coaches would see who outperforms who, and then, without the ability to redshirt anyone, a prospect can continue to be developed if they want to stick around and compete. They also wouldn't just rush to leave and transfer, since they know they have five years to play ball." Green Bay Packers center and 2022 third-rounder Sean Rhyan predicted stricter eligibility guidelines could change the way athletes think about transferring: Once the clock starts ticking, a case can no longer be made to rectify a misstep. "Five for five, that's fair. I think NIL is good, but I also think it took away that loyalty aspect that I think sports need," Rhyan said. "Having that fixed amount of time is going to bring that loyalty." And then Rhyan added perhaps the most convincing argument of all: "Having like a 27-year-old linebacker or something and then you have a 17-year-old running back ... I think five for five is more than fair." ------ AP Sports Writers Larry Lage, Steve Megargee and Brett Martel contributed to this report. ___ AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
